David Chappell

  • September 2020
  • November 2017
  • April 2017
  • October 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • August 2015
  • April 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003

Opinari

Get the Feed! Subscribe

Introducing Windows Server AppFabric  
# Monday, May 24, 2010
 
I know some application developers who really enjoy creating general infrastructure for their apps. My guess is that these people would be happier working for a software vendor--they shouldn't be application developers. Developers who get paid to write applications should write application code, not infrastructure. Software that provides general-purpose support for application logic--operating systems, database systems, and much more--should be provided by vendors.

Windows Server AppFabric is an important example of this. By providing caching and hosting services for Windows applications, it can reduce the amount of general-purpose infrastructure that app developers must write. I've written a Microsoft-sponsored introduction to this technology, available here, that provides a big-picture view of what it is and why you'd use it.

Don't confuse Windows Server AppFabric with Windows Azure AppFabric. Both have "AppFabric" in their names, and both provide infrastructure for applications, but they currently have no technologies in common. Microsoft tells us that this will change in the not-too-distant future, with the Windows Server AppFabric technologies appearing in Windows Azure AppFabric. You shouldn't let this throw you, though:  the caching and hosting services of Windows Server AppFabric can be useful for Windows apps today.


6 comments :: Post a Comment

 


Comments:

Excellent white paper, in just 20 page you have explained the practical use of AppFabric, AppFabric Hosting service, BizTalk Server, WCF and WF.

However following questions arises after reading this paper, can you throw some light or provide pointers/links:

1)In AppFabric Cache Cluster,
a)what type of replication is supported synchronous or asychronous?
b)Does it use disk i/o for
replication?
c)Does it support SQL 92 or do we have to use APIs
d)When the data is not found in cache does it automatically fatch it from database or needs to handled in code?
2)WF service is maintaining the state using its own database (persistent storage), and also supports monitoring of the service (again involves the use of persistent storage) - what is the overhead of state management and monitoring, are there any benchmark available for the same? Is there a option to use Cashing service instend of persistant data files?
 

I'm glad the paper was useful for you, Nilesh. Some answers:
- 1a: Updates to the secondary copy of a cached data item are asynchronous.
- 1b: Both the primary and secondary copies are held in memory, not on disk.
- 1c: The cache isn't a database, so you don't access it via SQL. Rather, you use either the provided APIs or another method, such as the built-in support for storing ASP.NET session object state.
- 1d: If the data isn't in the cache, your code needs to find it. The Caching service won't fetch it automatically.

- 2: I'm not aware of any current benchmarks for the performance of WF persistence, and using the Caching service for this isn't directly supported (although you might be able to achieve this with a custom persistence provider).
 

"Developers who get paid to write applications should write application code, not infrastructure.":)

Believe me, nobody (well, almost:)) writes an infrastructural code purely for fun. Usually it's just an easier and more controllable way than using infrastructural monsters provided by "vendors".
 

This is a really good point, Dmitry.

It does seem like the vendors are getting better about providing more modularized and less monstrous infrastructure options, though. Perhaps the wide available of simpler open source solutions (Spring comes to mind) has had some impact.
 

Are there any push replication implementations available for separate AppFabric clusters (most likely separated by a WAN)?

The ORACLE Coherence cache has a push replication feature but I can't find anything for AppFabric.
 

Not to my knowledge. I'd love to know what your scenario is, though. Why do you want this?
 

Post a Comment


<< Home