David Chappell

  • September 2020
  • November 2017
  • April 2017
  • October 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • August 2015
  • April 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003

Opinari

Get the Feed! Subscribe

What, Why, and How: Communicating with Different IT Audiences  
# Wednesday, April 19, 2017
 
I spent the first several years of my career writing code. For all of that time, I divided the technology world into two groups: developers and non-developers. I didn’t have much respect for the second group; they were mostly IT managers and marketing people, and they weren’t very technical. Even worse, they didn’t make decisions based solely on which option provided the best technical solution, an approach I thought was inexplicable.

When I first moved from writing code into writing books and giving presentations, I held onto this perspective. My audiences were largely developers, and like me, they knew that technical arguments were all that mattered. In fact, we agreed that unless you really understood the details of competing technologies, you could never make good decisions.

But I was wrong. I’ve now spent many years working with both groups of people, and I’ve learned that the best technology isn’t necessarily the best choice. Even more important, a deep technical understanding of the options isn’t necessary to make a good decision. I’ve come to have a great deal of respect for IT managers and marketing people.

The truth is that different audiences care about different things. When I’m talking to developers, I still focus on what a technology is and how it works—this is what developers care about. But when my audience is IT managers or marketing people or other less technical folks, I briefly describe the what, then move on to why they should care about it. These people don’t need to know how to use something—the what and the why are far more important.

If you’re trying to communicate with different IT audiences, you might find it helpful to be clear about this difference. This is especially true if you’re trying to sell something. Developers rarely sign checks—they’re not usually the final decision maker—and telling a deeply technical story to IT managers won’t persuade them. The thing to remember is this: developers care most about what and how, while IT managers care about what and especially why. Give each audience the information it needs--and only the information it needs--and you’re likely to be significantly more successful.


0 comments :: Post a Comment

 


Comments:

Post a Comment


<< Home