David Chappell

  • September 2020
  • November 2017
  • April 2017
  • October 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • August 2015
  • April 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003

Opinari

Get the Feed! Subscribe

Why It's Hard for Enterprises to Save Money with Cloud Platforms  
# Thursday, January 22, 2009
 
There's a widespread belief that once a company moves its in-house applications onto a cloud platform, its costs will go down. Intuitively, the idea makes sense. After all, big cloud providers like Microsoft and Google should enjoy incredible economies of scale. (I don't care who you are--their data centers are bigger than your data centers.) And assuming these economies are reflected in their prices, running your apps in their cloud ought to be cheaper, right?

Well, sure--someday. If you look at what the most visible cloud providers offer today, however, this assumption turns out to be largely incorrect. The primary falsehood is the belief that an organization can move its on-premises applications to the cloud unchanged. While this isn't impossible--more on that in a minute--it can certainly be problematic.

Consider Google's AppEngine, for example. It supports only one kind of application: Python Web apps. How many existing enterprise apps fit this description? And even if you do have an on-premises Python app that you'd like to move to the cloud, AppEngine's datastore is a Google-proprietary hierarchical system--it's not a relational database with SQL. Moving an existing application to this world, however cheap it might be to run once it's there, isn't an option for most.

Microsoft's Windows Azure offers similar challenges (today, at least). While it does provide a reasonably standard .NET environment, it also offers only a proprietary hierarchical datastore--no relational tables and no SQL. Once again, moving existing apps to this world is more than a little challenging.

In fact, neither AppEngine nor Windows Azure today is intended to run existing on-premises apps unchanged. Instead, both focus on letting us build very scalable applications for the Web. This is certainly a worthy goal--it's exactly what you need for building some new software. But it's not much help to an organization that just wants to run its current apps more cheaply.

Of the most visible cloud platforms today, Amazon's EC2 is the only one that offers the ability to run on-premises applications in the cloud. With EC2, you really do have the potential to move your apps to Amazon's cloud unchanged. Even then, though, will you save money? It depends, as others have pointed out. And other complexities also emerge, such as the challenge of managing applications running on a cloud platform. Even with EC2, moving your current apps into the cloud isn't a no-brainer.

A related point: It's often claimed that cloud platforms can provide a cheap on-demand solution for handling extra computing load, much as electric utilities rely on gas generators to handle spikes in demand. But this is only possible if I can run the same app unchanged in the cloud and on-premises (or, I suppose, if I've got a version of the app and its data for each environment, which isn't a simple thing to create). Once again, I can do this with EC2 but not (today, at least) with AppEngine or Windows Azure.

The equation seems simple: Cloud platform economies of scale equal a cheaper way for me to run my current apps. Yet when you look at what's out there today from the big vendors, much of what's on offer just doesn't allow this. Wanting something to be true doesn’t make it so.


6 comments :: Post a Comment

 


Comments:

I agree the custom-app-port-to-cloud isn't really viable today. However, moving commodity software products out of a local data center and into the cloud has the potential, IMO, to save a lot of money: hosted Sharepoint, Exchange, etc. I think it will be 2011 before we start to realize custom app benefits in the cloud.
 

Very nice post.. I think it will take 3-4 years before cloud platforms are mature enough for enterprises to give them serious consideration..But I think the ladder is leaning against the right wall.. Cloud platforms,from and only from big vendors like Microsoft/Amazon/Google, is hear to stay
 

Focusing on the cloud and the "Enterprise" misses the true benefit the technology will have on society.
Cloud platforms are a competitive advantage for new innovative startups interested in building Software as a Service solutions. There are exceptions, but this seems to be the current sweet spot for the cloud.
It will be interesting to see the types us services that will come out of cloud computing. I smell innovation! Giving the small development shops so much computing power with little upfront cost will be a good thing for all.
 

I pretty much agree with all of these comments. The last one is especially interesting: Web start-ups clearly are a major user of cloud platforms, and easy access to cheap data centers is a great thing for them (and through the innovations those start-ups bring, for us as well).

Still, if start-ups were to comprise the primary cloud platform user base for the indefinite future, I wonder how long these new platforms can last--start-ups aren't a big enough market to sustain much. The big IT money remains in enterprises, and so my hypothesis is that cloud platforms must attract enterprise applications to be long-term viable.
 

To the point that Enterprises have the only funds necessary to sustain cloud computing as a business model...Not all start ups remain small. Take a look at YouTube, Del.icio.us, Flickr, etc. There are also startup companies that will service the enterprise with innovative cloud based technology. The Enterprise may not innovate in the cloud, but Enterprise money will be paying for the cloud by consuming startup technology. At least until cloud is a trusted and accepted by many enterprises as a way to deploy technology, which IMHO will take awhile. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing, it just represents an opportunity for small companies.
 

Thanks for the post. You focus your attention to the development part, but the production side of it is also an issue. Large enterprises will not be able to rely on a sole cloud provider, so they will still have their traditional IT (outsourced or not). As I described in http://buzina.wordpress.com/2009/02/05/the-cloud-cost-saver-or-brain-saver/ there are other factors often neglected which drive the costs of such an endevor.
 

Post a Comment


<< Home