David Chappell

  • September 2020
  • November 2017
  • April 2017
  • October 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • August 2015
  • April 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003

Opinari

Get the Feed! Subscribe

The Sixth Platform  
# Sunday, December 28, 2008
 
How many different hardware platform styles have we seen in the history of business computing? Let's count.

First were mainframes, appearing in the 1960s. Next were minicomputers, which got popular in the 1970s. Desktop computers were next, in the eighties, followed by servers based on similar technology. I'd also argue that mobile devices, especially phones, qualify as an important platform style.

Mainframes, minicomputers, desktops, servers, mobile phones: That's five platform styles in a little less than 50 years. New kinds of hardware platforms for business computing just don't appear very often.

Yet one is being born right now: The cloud is the sixth platform.

New platforms don't replace what came before--they add another option. Just as mainframes weren't wiped out by minicomputers, desktop machines, or anything else, so the cloud won't eliminate any of the earlier platform styles. It just provides another choice for us to use.

Given how rarely new platform styles appear, we're all lucky to be here when one is emerging. For anybody who cares about technology, it's a great time to be alive.


6 comments :: Post a Comment

 


Comments:

While I would agree cloud is a new platform. I do not agree with the lack of platforms. There have been many platforms. Here is a list of a few to add to your list:

Netbook,
Laptop,
Tablet,
Touch Screen Systems,
POS Platforms (think resturants and retail),
Gaming Consoles,
Gaming Consoles hand helds,
Apple/Zune devices as a platform,
The list is virtually endless.

Will all these platforms stand the test time time. I think not. But some are perennials and others will be melded into the general PC experience. Like Windows including touch out of the box with Windows 7 basically making Tablet PCs a given.
 

A couple of responses, Josh. First, notice that I was specifically referring to platforms for business computing. This is why things like game consoles (which I agree are a platform style) and Zunes (which at the moment are consumer devices) aren't included. Second, I'd argue that the other things you name either aren't different enough to qualify (laptops are just desktops that I can move--the apps they run are much the same), aimed at a specialized problem (POS platforms), or interface technologies rather than complete platforms (tablets and touch screens).

Still, there's probably no single list of platforms that everybody would agree on. I just find this one a useful way to think about our world today.
 

It's amazing how similar the Cloud platform is to Mainframe. You could put the feature lists side by side and almost not be able to tell the difference.
 

I agree--clouds look a lot like mainframes. One hugely important difference, though, is the business model for public clouds. Unlike the mainframe-based service bureaus of the past, which typically required long-term contracts, cloud services like Amazon's EC2 are available to anybody on demand. Two guys with a laptop and a credit card now have immediate access to a world-class data center. This is a wonderful thing, no?
 

The Cloud model has been used in many mobile phones applications since there was no such a term even. While lacking device resources mobile developers had to use remote powers and services.

So i don't think that the Cloud model deserve to represent a new platform in this list. I don't even think that the mobile devices are a distinct platform also - see, if you say that laptop is a moveable desctop, then a mobile phone is a moveable desctop that combines its functions with a mainframe terminal ones.
 

There's no definition of "platform" that everybody would agree on. Here, I'm taking an application-oriented view, and so I'd argue that different platforms imply that you must write apps differently, as you typically do with desktop machines and cell phones (or mainframes and minicomputers). It's true that Web-based applications have been available for more than a decade, used by cell phones and in lots of other ways. What's new in the last couple of years is the ability for businesses and ISVs to create arbitrary applications on cloud platforms run by third parties: Amazon EC2, Microsoft's Windows Azure, etc. This is the change that constitutes a new platform type.
 

Post a Comment


<< Home