David Chappell

  • September 2020
  • November 2017
  • April 2017
  • October 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • August 2015
  • April 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003

Opinari

Get the Feed! Subscribe

Windows Live and the Good Ideas of Hailstorm  
# Thursday, March 30, 2006
 
As far as I could tell, I was one of the few people outside Microsoft who thought that .NET My Services--codenamed “Hailstorm”--was a good idea. The notion of Internet-accessible web services that developers could build applications on was clearly interesting, and the services themselves offered real potential: an alerts service, a presence service to figure out where to send those alerts, a common place to store contacts and other information, and more. I could easily imagine applications built on these services that would make my life better. I even devoted an entire chapter to .NET My Services in my book Understanding .NET, a decision I came to regret when the technology died.

This project's codename was well-chosen: .NET My Services brought down a storm of criticism on Microsoft. During its short lifetime, I gave talks about Hailstorm to many different groups in many countries. Largely because it included services to store personal information, the response was the same everywhere: “We don’t trust Microsoft to store our data”. Even the normally sober John Markoff, who tracked its rise and fall in a series of New York Times articles, seemed to think that .NET My Services was kind of scary.

But good ideas don’t die. Microsoft’s announcements about Windows Live in late 2005 and the latest ones at this month’s MIX 06 conference make very clear that parts of what Hailstorm offered are reappearing in a slightly different form. What’s public so far includes an alerts service, with alerts routed to a user based on presence information, a way to store contacts, and more. And unlike Hailstorm, Microsoft is talking about business models upfront, including support for advertising and others.

The Windows Live licensing does contain some interesting restrictions. Applications can be prohibited from integrating with a non-Microsoft search service, for example, a limitation that’s sure to apply primarily to Google. Google is now the current employer of Mark Lukovsky, who was the original force at Microsoft behind .NET My Services. It's plausible that Google could also provide Hailstorm-like services if they chose to, and I look forward to seeing what they decide to do. If this idea is any good at all--and I think it is--it ought to attract more than one competitor.

.NET My Services was the Apple Newton of this new market: a great idea, but the initial execution missed the mark. The first offering in a wholly new area commonly has this experience, but it does help everyone understand more about what’s really needed. Just as Palm learned from Apple’s mistakes and finally got the PDA thing right, someone will get the Hailstorm idea right. Maybe it’s Windows Live, maybe it’s Google, maybe it’s somebody else. Whoever does it, I look forward to the second coming of .NET My Services. This idea is too good to die.


0 comments :: Post a Comment

 


Comments:

Post a Comment


<< Home